I think there is a misunderstanding about what 'broken' means. Sure it is *possible* to do merges with SVN but it is not trivial, brainless and discoverable relative to rest of SVN.
Andy's definition of broken?=> "Not as easy as it can/should be." cs On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 02:46:23PM -0700, Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote: > On Jun 4, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > > >And SVN is broken in that it can't handle merges, distributed > >repositories, etc. > > What's broken wrt to merges in SVN? I know it handles the simple > cases of merges when I update or try to check something in, so I'm > assuming that's not the case you're talking about. Which, I suppose, > means I either don't know what you're talking about, or I've only > been blessed with simple merge cases. :) > > Gregory > > -- > Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > OpenPGP Key ID: EAF4844B keyserver: pgpkeys.mit.edu > > > > -- > [email protected] > http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
