begin quoting Lan Barnes as of Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:31:40AM -0700: [snip] > Yup and yup. It's annoying to me when profitable companies try to avoid > paying for services/SW. Sure, Linux is a good OS for a company, but why > not unpocket for a support contract or enterprise distro? How cheap is > that?
Real Cheap. > On SVN vs Perforce, I use SVN at home for my projects to get practice [snip] > But just like the CVS crowd before them, they seem to have become so > attached to their own opinions that they ignore the suggestions of their > user community. Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss. > Sad. (I wonder if I do that?) I think everyone does a little bit. But some groups do it more than others; one of these days I should look at the CVS code "in anger", just to see how hard it would be to add some features... (Versioning directories? Shouldn't be hard. Same for renames. Same for offline/laptop use. I don't care about atomic commits, as 99% of the time I commit one or two files, so that's not an itch for me, but a global commit count might be interesting, especially if it can be used an a $CommitNumber$ tag...) -- _ |\_ \| -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
