On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:34:01AM -0700, Stewart Stremler wrote:
> one of these days I should look at the CVS code "in anger",
> just to see how hard it would be to add some features...
>
Why? No, _really_? Because that's exactly what the SVN development crowd
did, keeping wherever possible scrupulous compatibility with the theory
and command structure of CVS. So what you propose has been done and done
well already.
Better to make use of your time scanning SVN for possible improvements
... like adding database labels ;-)
Hey, if you get serious about it, I might throw in with you[0] ...
provided it's not in <gag> C++.
[0] I read a military historian who contended that, during WWII, the
side that got Italy as an ally was put at a disadvantage over the side
that didn't. Keep that in mind as you consider recruiting me.
--
Lan Barnes
Linux Guy, SCM Specialist
Tcl/Tk Enthusiast
But let your communication be Yea, yea; nay, nay: for
whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
- Matthew 5:37 (Biblical basis for binary computing)
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
