begin  quoting Lan Barnes as of Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:19:57PM -0700:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:34:01AM -0700, Stewart Stremler wrote:
> > one of these days I should look at the CVS code "in anger",
> > just to see how hard it would be to add some features...
> 
> Why? No, _really_? Because that's exactly what the SVN development crowd
> did, keeping wherever possible scrupulous compatibility with the theory
> and command structure of CVS. So what you propose has been done and done
> well already.

Dependency hell is a huge argument against "done well".  I don't think
the SVN folks were wrong to go off and roll their own; I am pretty
convinced that what they did once they made that decision *was* wrong.

SVN has one feature going for it -- it's mostly compatible with the
CVS commandset/worldview. 

(I got tla running enough to pull down GST source, but the "worldview"
didn't make a lot of sense, and I didn't find any good documentation
in my brief search.  I intend to revisit the issue, as I need to pull
down GST 2.2b...)

> Better to make use of your time scanning SVN for possible improvements
> ... like adding database labels ;-)
 
There are some problems I'm willing to tackle. Others, I'm not. I'm
not willing to put up with _compiling_ SVN, much less trying to improve
it.  It fails my first quality-assessment test: they didn't KISS.

> Hey, if you get serious about it, I might throw in with you[0] ...
> provided it's not in <gag> C++.

I'm using C++ "in anger" now, and I am amazed that *anyone* would
seriously contemplate using it for non-toy problems.  I'm tempted to
spin up GNAT and to look for a PLI compiler, just to see if the other
"does everything" languages are as bad.

> [0] I read a military historian who contended that, during WWII, the
> side that got Italy as an ally was put at a disadvantage over the side
> that didn't. Keep that in mind as you consider recruiting me.

Heh. First, we need to find a problem to work on that doesn't
eliminate either one of us.

-- 
_ |\_
 \|


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to