On Mon, March 26, 2007 3:17 pm, Gabriel Sechan wrote: > You're self contradictory here. You say that marriage is the only > acceptable outlet for sex. Then you claim marriage isn't (just) about > sex. > Then you say the religion isn't sexuall repressed. At least one of these > is > not true.
What do you mean? Do you mean if marriage is about more than sex that suddenly it can't satisfy that anymore? Linux is trying to be a excellent desktop to compete for the end user. Does that mean it can't be a great web server anymore? >> > Many people in this country have >> > tried the sex without marriage route and it generally works pretty >> well. >> >>Marriage basically is about a promise not to abandon someone. I think >>most people want a promise like that. Whether sex without marriage >> works >>pretty well is a big question. I doubt it. I wonder if all the >>out-of-wedlock children would agree with you that it works pretty well. >> > You think they'd prefer to not be born instead? I think they'd prefer to be born into a home with married parents. Don't you? cs -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
