On Tue, March 27, 2007 1:39 pm, DJA wrote: > And that risk is what again? And don't bring up anything that has a > biological basis because being married (or not) has no direct causal > relationship with biology.
Are you saying there is no risk you can gather that exists in relationships? > The basic fallacy with your argument seems to be an assumption that > people either don't change, or that if they do change, then at least if > they are in a relationship (the formal version - marriage - seeming to > be the only relationship you accept as valid), they will both change in > the same direction. Well marriage can't force someone to keep their promise anymore than an excercise partner can guarantee you'll make it to the gym every week. The *hope* of course is that when the going gets tough and one feels like breaking their promises they'll think..."Gee I'm married so I should take this seriously since it is hard to leave..." Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
