Neil Schneider wrote:

Before you start spewing propoganda you might get your facts straight.
California may spend more than any other state, only because it has more
students. Ranked by per pupil spending california is 32nd in spending, and if
the Governor's cuts go through, it will be 48th.

.......
In 2001-02, California spent $6,542 per student, compared to the U.S. average
of $7,158, putting us 32nd among the states. When high costs are considered,
we ranked 46th among the states, spending only 82 percent of the national
average. The states that spent less included Mississippi, Tennessee and Utah
......

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/12/09/EDGGA3HJ311.DTL&hw=Straight+talk+on+school+spending&sn=005&sc=618

I can't believe that of all the things San Diego Unified could probably cut in their proposed budget, the biggest cut is teachers! Yeah, that's the problem. Maybe we should just have one teacher per school; put all the kids in one big lecture room. That'd save a lot of money. In fact, eliminate teachers altogether - they seem to be such a pesky and whiny lot.

Come the next election, I'm going to vote to fire every member of the school board running for re-election.

--
   Best Regards,
      ~DJA.


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to