begin  quoting Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade as of Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:29:26PM -0700:
> On Mar 21, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Ralph Shumaker wrote:
> 
> >In between those two should be one other, but Sparky seems to kill  
> >that one.  I tried adding the field "Reply-To:" and directing it to  
> >the -kooler list.  This would have the benefit of allowing anyone in  
> >the current list to see my post, but if they try to reply they will  
> >have to be subscribed to the -kooler list.  Of course, he would have  
> >the option to force his response back to the current list or to  
> >reply privately.
> 
> In previous, nearly endless, debates, it was decided that the default  
> behavior of "hitting 'reply' replies to the list" was desired.   
> Indeed, that's how it's done on nearly every mailing list I'm on, and  
> lists that don't behave that way really throw me off.  For all intents  
> and purposes, think of the list as a newsgroup, and replies by default  
> go to the group.

Unfortuneately, newsreaders tend to respect Followup-To:.... which is
where the problem seems to be occurring.

> Mailman (and most list managers) enforce this by setting Reply-To: to  
> the list address.  The Nicer Solution (tm) would be if clients would  
> ALSO support Followups-To:, but it seems that only mutt offers that  
> option, IIRC.  (I'm not a mutt user, btw.)

Isn't the Mail-Followup-To: header meant for those other mail clients?
It's what I do to mitigate the problem with some clients that ignore
the Reply-To: and prefer to send a response directly to the From:
address, and it seems to be working.

> IMHO, changing the To: header in a reply is not any harder than adding  
> a Followups-To: or Reply-To:, with the added benefit that the list  
> manager won't mangle the To: header.

Change the To:, wedge [Kooler] in the Subject:, add a Mail-Followup-To:,
and Cc: to the original list and then drop further conversation in the
main list?

> Never a perfect solution, and we'll never make everyone happy, but  
> close enough is good enough, right? :)

Putting [Kooler] in the subject is an easy first step, I would think.

Wonder if we could convince mailman to reroute email with "Re: [Kooler]" 
in the subject line to -kooler?

-- 
Never let it be said that I dislike all of Bob's Great Ideas.
Stewart Stremler


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to