Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote:
On Mar 21, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Ralph Shumaker wrote:
In between those two should be one other, but Sparky seems to kill
that one. I tried adding the field "Reply-To:" and directing it to
the -kooler list. This would have the benefit of allowing anyone in
the current list to see my post, but if they try to reply they will
have to be subscribed to the -kooler list. Of course, he would have
the option to force his response back to the current list or to reply
privately.
In previous, nearly endless, debates, it was decided that the default
behavior of "hitting 'reply' replies to the list" was desired.
Indeed, that's how it's done on nearly every mailing list I'm on, and
lists that don't behave that way really throw me off. For all intents
and purposes, think of the list as a newsgroup, and replies by default
go to the group.
Mailman (and most list managers) enforce this by setting Reply-To: to
the list address. The Nicer Solution (tm) would be if clients would
ALSO support Followups-To:, but it seems that only mutt offers that
option, IIRC. (I'm not a mutt user, btw.)
IMHO, changing the To: header in a reply is not any harder than adding
a Followups-To: or Reply-To:, with the added benefit that the list
manager won't mangle the To: header.
Never a perfect solution, and we'll never make everyone happy, but
close enough is good enough, right? :)
Okee dokee.
--
Ralph
--------------------
I am considering using Sorbothane sheet padding to protect the HD. Now
supposedly Sorbothane can absorb up 95% of a shock. But I am not sure
how effective this will be.?
--Randall Shimizu
Is the goal to protect the HD while it's in a gear bag being taken
somewhere, or will it be running on/in a paint shaker?
--Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
