On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Robert Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Todd Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Chris Louden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Todd Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> 167.190.1.24 (address) and 255.255.255.248 (mask) >>>> >>>> which yields an IP range of... ? >>> >>> 167.190.1.25 - 167.190.1.30 >>> >>>> >>>> Sometimes the mask is like 255.255.240.0 or 255.255.255.192. Aagh! >>> >>> 167.190.0.1 - 167.190.15.254 >>> or >>> 167.190.1.1 - 167.190.1.62 >> >> With a network address of 167.190.1.24 and a mask of 255.255.255.192, >> wouldn't the range be: >> >> 167.190.1.25 to 167.190.1.254? >> >> -todd
Sorry several typos made that last post really annoying. Here we go again. Your first subnet address would be 192.168.1.64, with a range of > 192.168.1.65 to 192.168.1.127, > and your second available subnet would be 192.168.1.128, with a range > of 192.168.1.129 to 192.168.1.254. > > Read this http://www.tradecraftsolutions.com/TCSMain/Sub-supernets.odt > for further details. Robert Donovan -- KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
