Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > On 3/5/07, Ralph Shumaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> James G. Sack (jim) wrote: >> >> >Every method and scheme and process that comes along ends up being >> >pitched (or caught?) by _someone_ as the solution to all the world's >> >problems. None of them are, of course. The challenge is to discover what >> >is useful, where. Pardon the generalized handwaving, but I really do >> >think a yin/yang approach works better than a black/white one. >> >> And yet the symbol for yin/yang is black/white. > > With a little bit of each in the other and a curvy border meant to > represent a dynamic boundary rendered as static only because paper is > so. Of course, now that we have computers we can do this: > http://personal.denison.edu/~stocker/aniyin.gif > > Although it's missing the "yin in yang" and "yang in yin". > > (Found at http://personal.denison.edu/~stocker/yinyanganimated.html -- > and gotta love that mid-90's web style! His home page is even > "better".)
Yeah! I enjoyed it. (Although I would vote against the scrolling status message on his homepage). For some reason, I envisioned dollar signs for some of the images. Hmmm. Maybe we could use a y/y smiley? (meaning maybe? or yes&no? or..). Regards, ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
