Stewart Stremler wrote:
I would run so long as I didn't take a seat away from another SIG.
The one thing I wanted that didn't get done in the bylaw/SIG guidelines change was to have the board itself reworked so that it has the four officer positions, and all other "at-large" director chairs actually be filled by a SIG representative, one-per-SIG. That would be a requirement of SIG membership, and would give all SIGs board voting rights. Yes, it would mean that the size of SDCS board varies based on quantity of SIGs, but I don't think that'd be a bad thing.
Right now we still have the four officers and (five?) at-large chairs, with SIG representatives required to attend. That's not bad and surely opens up the communication channels (though I don't think the SIG attendance rule has been enforced), but it still doesn't give SIGs voting rights. Plus you have to dig up 5 other people to volunteer.
-- Joshua Penix http://www.binarytribe.com Binary Tribe Linux Integration Services & Network Consulting
-- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
