begin quoting Joshua Penix as of Tue, May 10, 2005 at 07:42:58PM -0700: > The one thing I wanted that didn't get done in the bylaw/SIG guidelines > change was to have the board itself reworked so that it has the four > officer positions, and all other "at-large" director chairs actually be > filled by a SIG representative, one-per-SIG. That would be a > requirement of SIG membership, and would give all SIGs board voting > rights. Yes, it would mean that the size of SDCS board varies based on > quantity of SIGs, but I don't think that'd be a bad thing.
Agreed. > Right now we still have the four officers and (five?) at-large chairs, > with SIG representatives required to attend. That's not bad and surely > opens up the communication channels (though I don't think the SIG > attendance rule has been enforced), but it still doesn't give SIGs > voting rights. Plus you have to dig up 5 other people to volunteer. So it's four officers, five chairs, and N SIG reps, and nine votes? -Stewart
pgpI7iWtIlQk2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
