I think you missed (or haven't yet reached) a couple of later messages
in this thread, but see remarks interspersed below, anyway..

Tracy R Reed wrote:
>.. 
> I have the books now and will bring them to the meeting for the raffle.

OK. I'm not sure whether RaffleMeister Gus is coming to the Aug10
meeting or not, but I still have the tickets, etc from my stint as
ersatzRaffleMeister in July, so I'll bring that stuff.

> 
>> 2. If no one objects, I will coordinate the August 10th meeting program.
>> I will volunteer one 15-minute presentation, and try to drum up
>> commitments for more. My thinking is that we want to try a variety of
> 
> Sounds good. ..

Neil posted that you had agreed to presiding at the meeting, is that
your understanding?

>.. Do you have any commitments yet? I know I offered a short
> list of things I could present on a while back but I don't recall what
> they were now. Nor do I recall if they were short, shallow topics. ..

Checkout some of the suggestions at
  http://www.kernel-panic.org/wiki/MeetingProgramIdeas
as well as
  http://www.kernel-panic.org/wiki/MeetingAug10
and
  http://www.kernel-panic.org/wiki/MiniPresentation

Some of the topics came from your earlier messages, in the March mail
archives, I think.

We have a couple of topics slotted-in /are/ still looking for 2 or 3 more.

N O T E:
-------
 Nobody knows whether 15-minute mini presentations will really work. The
15-min number was just a thought  -- 10 mins for a really-short
verrrry-narrowly-focused howto, and 5 mins for Q&A.

Maybe it is too easy to ramble over the limit, but I thought it still is
worth a try to see how such a shallow presentation is received (if
anyone is good enough to actually get it down to 10-15 mins).

I don't see any law that forces such a time-limit. It's just an idea.

I do think that aiming for general-interest topics, easily digested
(supposedly helped by sticking to a narrow-scope), would deliver value
to those KPLUGgers that have in the past been overwhelmed by technical
detail or arcane subjects. Well, that's the idea, anyhow.

>..The
> only problem I see with doing mini-presentations is that most
> interesting things will need a computer to demo or present with and the
> setup time with the projector is always longer than we would like. I
> wish I had a laptop right now that I could let everyone use for their
> presentations.

Oh, yeah! I overlooked that detail in my previous postings.

Neil addressed the potential projector issue by confirming we have room
401 for Aug10, but I guess it would be nice to have a computer, also

My presentation should have one with both gnome (for nautilus,
file-roller) and kde (for konqueror and karchive).

Hmmm, any volunteers? If no one offers a laptop/or? to share, I'm sure I
can bring in something as above. Presenters should perhaps post their
requirements on the MeetingAug10 page.

> 
>> 3. What's the status of projection equipment for Annex-C. Was last month
>> someone's personal projector? Seem like we just gotta have a projector
>> for presentations, eh? This seems like a *high priority* issue.
> 
> I missed the last meeting so I can't speak to this.

Neil deflected this issue for Aug10, but I have started another wiki
page to talk about it..
  http://www.kernel-panic.org/wiki/KpProjectProjector

..jim

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer

Reply via email to