Leaving off the alternator part of it is all one needs to do in order to 
preserve the flexibility on ADS-B. A wind turbine and a solar panel should 
suffice. A magneto ignition requires no power. An odyssey battery can make many 
many starts between charges. So I think we have a viable option.
As to those who have evolved the simple original concept of a KR1 into highly 
complex platforms, cool. And I wont even "reserve the right to say I told you 
so" when some part of that complexity is cited in an NTSB report.
The more I bat the options around, the more I like Ken Rand's 310lb 1200cc 
N1436 which is my PC wall paper!



> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:44:36 -0600
> To: krnet at list.krnet.org
> Subject: KR> Electrical systems
> From: krnet at list.krnet.org
> 
> Probably 98% of experimental airplanes have a battery, alternator, and 
> starter for several reasons...it's a lot more convenient, it's a lot 
> more flexible, and it's just plain safer.
> 
> I had a total of three takeoffs and landings on my plane and was turning 
> climbing out on crosswind when I pulled the mixture knob way back 
> instead of the throttle.  Stupid, yes, but the engine quit instantly. 
> If had not had a starter, that would likely have been the end of my 
> airplane, right there!
> 
> Troy Petteway has thousands of hours in everything from Citations to 
> Champs, and he accidentally killed his KR engine while out in the hills 
> of TN.  He didn't have a starter, and the plane was damaged landing on a 
> narrow farm road that most people wouldn't have even made it to.  When 
> he rebuilt the plane, it had a starter, battery, and alternator!
> 
> The story of the guy hand-propping and  only one chock on place...not 
> terribly unusual.  He's lucky the prop didn't get him in the process.
> 
> If you charge your battery every night, what do you do when you fly to 
> OSH or SNF and it's a 3.5 hour flight, then return a few days later. 
> It's bad enough to worry about running out of fuel, but to have your 
> ignition quit before you thought it would because it's 30 degrees colder 
> than you've flown before...stuff like that will get you!
> 
> Why stack the odds so high against yourself to save a few pounds?  We 
> are not operating in a realm where 20 pounds is going to mean we fly or 
> not.
> 
> Of course I'm not telling you how to run your life or your 
> airplane...all I can do is point out the obvious downside, but I reserve 
> the right to say "I told you so"...
> 
> Mark Langford
> ML at N56ML.com
> http://www.n56ml.com
> 
> 

Reply via email to