Craig,
I built an engine mount for my KR2 with an O235 L2C. The engine needs to be
mounted as high as possible within the confines of fuse. This means the mount
tubes running from the upper longerons to the conical mount ring will be angled
uphill. Another tube will extend from the upper longeron mount down to the
lower mount on the conical ring as well as from the lower longeron mount. I
also ran tubes from the upper longeron mount to the upper crossover tube on
both sides. This design is fairly standard for lycoming engines. If your O235
is a C model, the mount would be similar to the O200. engine mount.
Roger Baalman
rbaalman at cox.net
-
> > Has anyone here been involved in designing an engine mount before. Looking
> > for
> > general rules to follow. I wanted to keep the upper mounts as close to the
> > Longeron as possible but that mean the upper tubes would be angled up to the
> > upper conical mount points. I'm wondering if that is ok or is it best to
> > keep
> > the geometry of the tubes down since the upper tubes are in tension and the
> > lower are in compression by the weight of the engine.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Craig
> > www.kr2seafury.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> > see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> > options
>
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options
