Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Roland Mainz wrote: > > Sorry for my screaming&&wailing... the complaint/comment was not in your > > direction... the problem is that the OS/Net rules require a "putback > > with no known bugs in the code" > > Really? I've never done an ON putback, but I thought it was "no known > significant bugs" (on our priority scale, no Priority 1, 2, or 3 bugs, > but Priority 4 & 5 are allowed - it would be a true acheivement for any > major software to be 100% bug free in any practical amount of time). > > Of course, other consolidations have looser rules, so once again, you're > hitting higher obstacles because you fought so hard to go into ON. 8-)
Yes, yes, my fault... but if we want to replace /usr/bin/ksh we have to follow the strict OS/Net rules or will never succeed with that project goal. ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
