Joseph Kowalski wrote: > Roland Mainz wrote: > >> Please use libmd(3lib) unless there is a very compelling reason not to > >> do so - if there I would like to see that documented here. > > > > There is no compelling reason, however I would prefer to defer this to > > the putback following the one we've prepared for this ARC case. We > > already have all the code tested&&running, the upstream ksh93s+ > > development series is more or less "closed" (unless serve crashers&co. > > are found) and IMO it would be better to put a new feature like "Solaris > > libmd accerlation support" in the ksh93t- development cycle which would > > give us enougth time to test this feature... > > > > ... or short: Yes, we will do it but we would prefer not to rush this > > code into the codebase using a crowbar. Is that "Ok" for you ? > > The short answer is "No". This isn't the way OpenSolaris integration works.
You did see the comment that I said "... yes, we will do it..." ? > We could probably accept a modified proposal that eliminated all "sum" > references. Groan... sounds we have to use the crowbar to get libsum to use Solaris's libmd... ;-( ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
