Roland Mainz wrote:
> Darren:
> 1. Are the changes Ok for you ? If "yes" I'll post a diff for the ARC
> case+manpages...

Yes that is fine.

> 2. Are there any CDDL or Sun-owned versions of the optimized MD5/SHA*
> functions (I'm asking since the ksh93-integration project has the
> permission to contribute any Sun/CDDL code back to AT&T upstream under
> their license and AFAIK some optimized versions of these functions may
> be "nice to have") ?

See $SRC/uts/common/crypto/
-- 
Darren J Moffat

Reply via email to