Joseph Kowalski wrote: > Roland Mainz wrote: > > Joseph Kowalski wrote: > >> The short answer is "No". This isn't the way OpenSolaris integration > >> works. > > > > You did see the comment that I said "... yes, we will do it..." ? > > Yes I did. > > We don't integrate what is determined to be the "less optional" > architecture with a promise that it will later be done right.
Erm... technically the code works as expected and we don't have any regressions since the "-x" option is a new feature. The only issue is that it runs a bit slower for large files (hey, for smaller files it runs even faster than /usr/bin/digest ... :-) ) ... .. from an adminstrative+management point of view I fully agree with you... .. the only thing I wish is that we had more time... ;-/ Anyway... enough the wailing... we're going to address the issue... :-) .. is there anything else which needs to be fixed for libsum and/or /usr/bin/sum ? > There a couple of pithy phrases about this. They are rather obvious: > > "The heartbreak of phase 2" (It happens less often than not) > > "The cement truck syndrome" (What if Roland gets hit by a...) Grumpf... I don't want to be hit by a truck. ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
