> Personally I wouldn't do that. If a user is smart enough for wanting another > browser, he should be able to go and install it himself. > > Maybe here the problem is that Kubuntu is not advertising the software > centers properly. > From my side, if there's anything we can do to improve this situation from > Muon, I think it would be a huge step forward, and not only for browsers, > but other areas could benefit from such deals. Maybe rekonq can provide a > list of alternatives and use muon to install them? Afterall, chromium > already suggests you other browsers, IIRC. >
I am not sure whether or not chromium suggests other browsers, but I agree that Muon itself needs more exposure, which is why we should : a) Put it as one of the apps under Favorites b) Update the feature tour on kubuntu.org to showcase Muon as the preferred way to install things. > Additionally, you didn't mention in the Con's that it means to add GTK > dependencies, which I'm fine with by the way, but AFAIK right now ubuntu > forked the kde-gtk-config package to not need GTK. > You seem to have misunderstood me, I'll repeat again, I was not proposing to put Firefox on the Live Media itself. Instead, I was proposing to have a page in the installer that allows a user to choose betweek Firefox/Chromium/Rekonq, with Firefox/Chromium being downloaded during the install phase. > Aleix > > -- > kubuntu-devel mailing list > kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel > -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
