Carsten Otte wrote:
> I still do strongly agree with the general idea of this patch, and
> most of the split comes out just right now. However, there is one
> thing I'd like to pick on:
>
> decache_vcpus_on_cpu should be an arch callback, and rather than
> kvm_arch_vcpu_decache. There's no reason for s390 to grab locks and do
> the arch callback in a loop. The whole thing is nop for us, thus the
> whole thing should be a callback.
Hi Carsteno.
So we have to expose kvm_lock, and vm_list out. Is it OK?
Xiantao
> I'd really like to see this changed before the patch gets merged.
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a
> browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>
> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________
> kvm-devel mailing list
> kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
