Avi Kivity wrote: > Carsten Otte wrote: >> I still do strongly agree with the general idea of this patch, and >> most of the split comes out just right now. However, there is one >> thing I'd like to pick on: >> >> decache_vcpus_on_cpu should be an arch callback, and rather than >> kvm_arch_vcpu_decache. There's no reason for s390 to grab locks and >> do the arch callback in a loop. The whole thing is nop for us, thus >> the whole thing should be a callback. >> >> I'd really like to see this changed before the patch gets merged. > > Xiantao, can you address this?
Yes, adressed in attached patch. :)
0003-Using-kvm-arch-support-to-replace-kvm_x86_ops-and-f.patch
Description: 0003-Using-kvm-arch-support-to-replace-kvm_x86_ops-and-f.patch
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
