Carsten Otte wrote: > I still do strongly agree with the general idea of this patch, and > most of the split comes out just right now. However, there is one > thing I'd like to pick on: > > decache_vcpus_on_cpu should be an arch callback, and rather than > kvm_arch_vcpu_decache. There's no reason for s390 to grab locks and do > the arch callback in a loop. The whole thing is nop for us, thus the > whole thing should be a callback. > > I'd really like to see this changed before the patch gets merged.
Xiantao, can you address this? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
