Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Sheng Yang wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:50:57AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> The locic of kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr has a minor, practically hardly
>> Typo...
>>
>>> relevant incorrectness: PIC interrupts are still delivered even if the
>>> APIC of VPU0 (BSP) is disabled. This does not comply with the Virtual
>>> Wire mode according to the Intel MP spec.
>>>
>>> To avoid side effects, the BSP APIC is now enabled on reset.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c |   19 +++++++++----------
>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Index: b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>>> @@ -933,7 +933,8 @@ void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vc
>>>     update_divide_count(apic);
>>>     atomic_set(&apic->timer.pending, 0);
>>>     if (vcpu->vcpu_id == 0)
>>> -           vcpu->arch.apic_base |= MSR_IA32_APICBASE_BSP;
>>> +           vcpu->arch.apic_base |=
>>> +                   MSR_IA32_APICBASE_BSP | MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE;
>> I think this have already been done in vmx_vcpu_reset()/svm_create_vcpu()?
> 
> Indeed, will drop that hunk.
> 
>>>     apic_update_ppr(apic);
>>>  
>>>     apic_debug(KERN_INFO "%s: vcpu=%p, id=%d, base_msr="
>>> @@ -1089,17 +1090,15 @@ int kvm_apic_has_interrupt(struct kvm_vc
>>>  
>>>  int kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>  {
>>> +   struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
>>>     u32 lvt0 = apic_get_reg(vcpu->arch.apic, APIC_LVT0);
>> Reuse just defined variable "apic"?
> 
> [ Cleaning my glasses ] Ahh, I see. :)
> 
>>> -   int r = 0;
>>>  
>>> -   if (vcpu->vcpu_id == 0) {
>>> -           if (!apic_hw_enabled(vcpu->arch.apic))
>>> -                   r = 1;
>>> -           if ((lvt0 & APIC_LVT_MASKED) == 0 &&
>>> -               GET_APIC_DELIVERY_MODE(lvt0) == APIC_MODE_EXTINT)
>>> -                   r = 1;
>>> -   }
>>> -   return r;
>>> +   /* Virtual Wire mode, but we only deliver to the BSP. */
>>> +   if (vcpu->vcpu_id == 0 && apic_hw_enabled(apic)
>> Good point! How about apic_enabled(apic)? Software disable apic should also
>> can't functional(hope this wouldn't expose some bugs...)
> 
> apic_sw_enable is also covered by the LVT_MASKED check we do on delivery
> anyway. That's why I lest it out here. Can spend a comment, though.

Correction: LVT_MASKED is already checked here, one line below.

> 
>> --
>> regards
>> Yang, Sheng
>>
>>> +       && !(lvt0 & APIC_LVT_MASKED)
>>> +       && GET_APIC_DELIVERY_MODE(lvt0) == APIC_MODE_EXTINT)
>>> +           return 1;
>>> +   return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  void kvm_inject_apic_timer_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to