Jan Kiszka wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> [ taking Sheng's comments into account ] >>> >>> The logic of kvm_apic_accept_pic_intr has a minor, practically hardly >>> relevant incorrectness: PIC interrupts are still delivered even if the >>> APIC of VPU0 (BSP) is disabled. This does not comply with the Virtual >>> Wire mode according to the Intel MP spec. >>> >> This breaks Windows XP with the Standard PC HAL, so I am unapplying this >> patch. > > Hmm, this points to either an APIC setup or BIOS bug. To my > understanding, the Standard PC HAL should not fiddle with the APIC, so > what the BIOS leaves behind should counts. But I think I found no traces > of APIC manipulation in rombios32.c.
Manipulation on UP systems. There is fiddling for SMP. But I will check again. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
