On 07/23/2013 01:03 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :) I like the idea of a veto but only if it's used for when a particular language has had it's translations broken or corrupted in some way. Obviously the example of "French" was a bit daft because the French translation is always excellent. However, it's difficult to see a good example of when a veto might be needed or might have been good. You always seem to fix any problems. Perhaps having a formal veto option "written up" as a rule might encourage the very problem it's trying to forestall? Regards from Tom :)
Is it possible to just send an announce mail to the announcement list and worn translator to check their translations and then pool fixed translations from Pootle before official rc, so that all languages can get valid (the bug free) release?
-- To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
