On 07/23/2013 01:45 PM, Sérgio Marques wrote:
2013/7/23 Krunoslav Šebetić <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
On 07/23/2013 01:03 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I like the idea of a veto but only if it's used for when a
particular language has had it's translations broken or
corrupted in some way. Obviously the example of "French" was
a bit daft because the French translation is always excellent.
However, it's difficult to see a good example of when a veto
might be needed or might have been good. You always seem to
fix any problems. Perhaps having a formal veto option
"written up" as a rule might encourage the very problem it's
trying to forestall?
Regards from
Tom :)
Is it possible to just send an announce mail to the announcement
list and worn translator to check their translations and then pool
fixed translations from Pootle before official rc, so that all
languages can get valid (the bug free) release?
Usually when there are translation conflicts, Andras used to send a
message.
If he didn´t do it, I suppose that all merge went fine, isn´t it?
I'm fallowing this list for a few years but wasn't active till now, and
I'm not sure how it merged but bug is there.
Also:
If the only problem is same translation for "Heading" and "Title" my
proposal is change only "Title" to "Document Title". The other should stay
as is.
I don't think that anything should be changed in english LO strings, if
original differs heading from title, translators should be careful about
that, it can not be translated the same.
We also have problem with that - it's only our fault...
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
