I am officially extending the vote until after next board report + meeting.

rgds
jan I.


On 28 February 2014 14:40, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 and thanks a lot!
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:36 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > This proposal is identical to the 2 earlier proposals, which failed to
> > get enough votes.
> >
> > This change in the bylaws [2] requires 2/3 vote +1 of the PMC members.
> >
> > VOTE runs until 15 march 2014, and can be extended if deemed necessary.
> >
> > Vote +1 if you agree to to following
> >
> > - Every ASF committer can ask for one or more labs. The lab creation
> > requires PMC lazy concensus, if no PMC sends a mail with -1
> > tol...@labs.apache.org within the lazy consensus period (72hours), the
> > lab request is
> > accepted.
> >
> > from/replacing
> >
> >  - Every ASF committer can ask for one or more labs. The creation of
> >    the lab requires a PMC lazy consensus vote
> >    (at least three +1 and no -1, 72 hours).
> >
> >
> > Reasoning:
> >
> > The charter [1] and homepage [2] for labs says:
> >
> >  - Every ASF committer can ask for one or more labs. The creation of
> >    the lab requires a PMC lazy consensus vote
> >    (at least three +1 and no -1, 72 hours).
> >
> > However the foundations glossary [3] defines lazy consensus today as:
> >
> > *Lazy consensus*(Also called 'lazy approval'.) A decision-making policy
> > which assumes general consent if no responses are posted within a defined
> > period. For example, "I'm going to commit this by lazy consensus if
> no-one
> > objects within the next three days." Also see Consensus
> > Approval<
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ConsensusApproval
> > >,
> > Majority
> > Approval <
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval
> > >,
> > and the description of the voting
> > process <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>.
> >
> > Due a lazy consensus decision among PMC, earlier +1 votes are
> > considered valid (of course a change in vote is fully acceptable):
> >
> > Danny Angus +1
> > Geir Magnusson Jr +1
> > J Aaron Farr +1
> > Niall Pemberton +1
> > Santiago Gala +1
> > Simone Gianny +1
> > Simone Tripodi +1
> > Tim Williams +1
> >
> > We need binding votes from:
> >
> > Erik Abele
> > Gregor Rothfuss
> > Jan Iversen
> > Noel J. Bergman
> > Graham Leggett
> > Reinhard Poetz
> > Garrett Rooney
> > Scott Sanders
> > Sander Temme
> >
> > How we manage to succeed this time.
> >
> > rgds
> > jan I
> >
>

Reply via email to