On 19 March 2014 18:55, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19 March 2014 07:49, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > I am officially extending the vote until after next board report + > meeting. > > If that does not work, I suggest dealing with the inactive PMC members > first, and then re-running the vote. >
A good suggestion, there is a reason why the new date is after next board meeting :-) rgds jan I. > > > rgds > > jan I. > > > > > > On 28 February 2014 14:40, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> +1 and thanks a lot! > >> -Simo > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:36 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi. > >> > > >> > This proposal is identical to the 2 earlier proposals, which failed to > >> > get enough votes. > >> > > >> > This change in the bylaws [2] requires 2/3 vote +1 of the PMC members. > >> > > >> > VOTE runs until 15 march 2014, and can be extended if deemed > necessary. > >> > > >> > Vote +1 if you agree to to following > >> > > >> > - Every ASF committer can ask for one or more labs. The lab creation > >> > requires PMC lazy concensus, if no PMC sends a mail with -1 > >> > tol...@labs.apache.org within the lazy consensus period (72hours), > the > >> > lab request is > >> > accepted. > >> > > >> > from/replacing > >> > > >> > - Every ASF committer can ask for one or more labs. The creation of > >> > the lab requires a PMC lazy consensus vote > >> > (at least three +1 and no -1, 72 hours). > >> > > >> > > >> > Reasoning: > >> > > >> > The charter [1] and homepage [2] for labs says: > >> > > >> > - Every ASF committer can ask for one or more labs. The creation of > >> > the lab requires a PMC lazy consensus vote > >> > (at least three +1 and no -1, 72 hours). > >> > > >> > However the foundations glossary [3] defines lazy consensus today as: > >> > > >> > *Lazy consensus*(Also called 'lazy approval'.) A decision-making > policy > >> > which assumes general consent if no responses are posted within a > defined > >> > period. For example, "I'm going to commit this by lazy consensus if > >> no-one > >> > objects within the next three days." Also see Consensus > >> > Approval< > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ConsensusApproval > >> > >, > >> > Majority > >> > Approval < > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval > >> > >, > >> > and the description of the voting > >> > process <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>. > >> > > >> > Due a lazy consensus decision among PMC, earlier +1 votes are > >> > considered valid (of course a change in vote is fully acceptable): > >> > > >> > Danny Angus +1 > >> > Geir Magnusson Jr +1 > >> > J Aaron Farr +1 > >> > Niall Pemberton +1 > >> > Santiago Gala +1 > >> > Simone Gianny +1 > >> > Simone Tripodi +1 > >> > Tim Williams +1 > >> > > >> > We need binding votes from: > >> > > >> > Erik Abele > >> > Gregor Rothfuss > >> > Jan Iversen > >> > Noel J. Bergman > >> > Graham Leggett > >> > Reinhard Poetz > >> > Garrett Rooney > >> > Scott Sanders > >> > Sander Temme > >> > > >> > How we manage to succeed this time. > >> > > >> > rgds > >> > jan I > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: labs-h...@labs.apache.org > >
