On 19 March 2014 07:49, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > I am officially extending the vote until after next board report + meeting.
If that does not work, I suggest dealing with the inactive PMC members first, and then re-running the vote. > rgds > jan I. > > > On 28 February 2014 14:40, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 and thanks a lot! >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:36 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Hi. >> > >> > This proposal is identical to the 2 earlier proposals, which failed to >> > get enough votes. >> > >> > This change in the bylaws [2] requires 2/3 vote +1 of the PMC members. >> > >> > VOTE runs until 15 march 2014, and can be extended if deemed necessary. >> > >> > Vote +1 if you agree to to following >> > >> > - Every ASF committer can ask for one or more labs. The lab creation >> > requires PMC lazy concensus, if no PMC sends a mail with -1 >> > tol...@labs.apache.org within the lazy consensus period (72hours), the >> > lab request is >> > accepted. >> > >> > from/replacing >> > >> > - Every ASF committer can ask for one or more labs. The creation of >> > the lab requires a PMC lazy consensus vote >> > (at least three +1 and no -1, 72 hours). >> > >> > >> > Reasoning: >> > >> > The charter [1] and homepage [2] for labs says: >> > >> > - Every ASF committer can ask for one or more labs. The creation of >> > the lab requires a PMC lazy consensus vote >> > (at least three +1 and no -1, 72 hours). >> > >> > However the foundations glossary [3] defines lazy consensus today as: >> > >> > *Lazy consensus*(Also called 'lazy approval'.) A decision-making policy >> > which assumes general consent if no responses are posted within a defined >> > period. For example, "I'm going to commit this by lazy consensus if >> no-one >> > objects within the next three days." Also see Consensus >> > Approval< >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ConsensusApproval >> > >, >> > Majority >> > Approval < >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval >> > >, >> > and the description of the voting >> > process <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>. >> > >> > Due a lazy consensus decision among PMC, earlier +1 votes are >> > considered valid (of course a change in vote is fully acceptable): >> > >> > Danny Angus +1 >> > Geir Magnusson Jr +1 >> > J Aaron Farr +1 >> > Niall Pemberton +1 >> > Santiago Gala +1 >> > Simone Gianny +1 >> > Simone Tripodi +1 >> > Tim Williams +1 >> > >> > We need binding votes from: >> > >> > Erik Abele >> > Gregor Rothfuss >> > Jan Iversen >> > Noel J. Bergman >> > Graham Leggett >> > Reinhard Poetz >> > Garrett Rooney >> > Scott Sanders >> > Sander Temme >> > >> > How we manage to succeed this time. >> > >> > rgds >> > jan I >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: labs-h...@labs.apache.org
