I am working on a Chantilly fan and I am thinking about pins.  None of my
lace books talk about this subject.
  I have three boxes of pins:
       38 x .40 mm  long and thin
       30 x .50 mm  --> my usual <--
       17 x .45 mm  short and thin
  Recall that Chantilly is a "you can never have too many bobbins" sort of 
lace.
This particular piece uses about 85 pairs and is I guess is about 7 footside 
per cm
{17 footside per in).  Since previously my maximum was 50 pairs and I worked 
at 14 ft/inch, you see that I am being ambitious.  Also, I do not actually 
know how
to make Chantilly, so I am pretending it is Bucks Point.
  This piece is very simple and consists mainly of large blocky half-stitch 
figures
and ground.
   Method might be relevant,  so I say that I am using a big octogonal block 
pillow
(9 blocks, corner blocks are triangles, blocks move in all directions).  It 
is 23 inches
wide.  This is my main pillow; almost all my lace exercises have been done on 
it,
from the very beginning up until now.  The bobbins, all spangled Midlands,  
lie flat 
on  my pillow while I work( ie hands-down).  I hate it when the ends of the 
bobbins 
dangle off the end of the pillow.  I always pre-prick.
  Since I can only actually work with 10-15 pairs of bobbins at a time and 
Bucks
Point usually uses more than that, I need a way to get rid of all those extra 
bobbins.  I use spring stitch holders, which are thin plastic rods with 
stretchy 
metal closures.  They hold about 9 pairs, 10 if I push it.  All my unused 
bobbins 
are bound in holders and thrown over to the left and right top sides of the 
pillow, out 
of the way of my working area. When I started I used holders even when I only 
had about 15 total pairs since it is so nice to really focus on the 
particular motif
I'm working on, secure in the knowledge that the unused bobbins can't possibly
become disarranged.  Besides, they need to go in holders anyway when I finish
my session and put the pillow down.
   Preparing for my new Chantilly project, I became worried that my usual pins
were too thick.  The holes in the pricking are so close together!  Surely 
they are
about as close as the diameter of a pin.  So I decided to try smaller pins.  
I bought
the short and thin box and started the lace.
  The short and thin pins didn't last more than two rows of lace.  They were 
horrible,
absolutely horrible to use.  The threads kept on looping over the tops of the 
pins and
becoming disarranged.  After two painstakingly tedious rows I gave up and 
went to
my usual pins.  It was such a relief to no longer have to intensely 
concentrate on my
threads' not hopping and to just zip quickly along, lacing away.
  So I decided that maybe short pins are bad for Chantilly/Bucks Point.  Maybe
when you have any type of lace that uses lots of bobbins which need to be 
thrown 
back and stacked, then short pins are bad because the threads of the 
thrown-back 
bobbins naturally rise up a little and so loop over short pins.  Could this 
be true?
  So I bought a box(actually, tube) of the long and thin pins.  When I got 
them I
was disappointed becuase there weren't very many of them (about 150) and they
were so thin that they hurt my fingers when I pushed them in.
    I contemplated my pricking more carefully.  It seemed to me that in fact 
my usual
pins could be used in the ground (17 ftsd/in, remember), although it does 
make for a
particularly impenetrable pin thicket--no possible way of spotting mistakes 
until they
get out of the thicket.  The problem was the half-stitch figures, which in 
many places 
were almost twice as dense as the ground (ie two half-stitch pins for every 
ground 
stitch that goes in and out).  So I decided to use the long and thin pins for 
the figures
and my usual pins for the ground.  That way my fingers got a bit of rest from 
pushing
the thin pins and I wouldn't use very many thin pins at a time so I wouldn't 
run out.
What made this idea particularly feasible is that the difference in the 
lengths of the 
pins meant I could easily distinguish between the two types when I was 
reaching into
the thicket for a new pin.
   So, just as I finished off the starting rows of the fan and approached my 
very first 
figure, I switched to the ground->usual, figure->thin method.
  Now it is several weeks later and everything has worked out well.  The only 
problem 
is that I find that the long and thin pins bend.  I bet that about a third of 
them are 
severely bent!  I've been using my usual pins for years and the most heavily 
used 
ones have only a mild bend.  These new pins have gotten all beat up after 
just a few 
pushes!
  I think a lot of the bending is due to my not placing the pins accurately 
and so 
sometimes not being centered in my pre-pricked pricking holes.  Also, because 
the 
holes are so very close together and hard to see, there are times when I miss 
the prepricked holes completely and force the pin thropugh the pricking.  
Regardless,
clearly these pins bend too easily.  It is all for the best therefore that I 
am not also 
using them for the ground.
  My finger has gotten callused so the thin pins are no longer painful to 
push in. 
Although lately that hasn't been an issue anyway since I've been using two 
hands 
to push the pins in (one hand at the base to steady the pin so it doesn't 
bend).
  The holes have gotten much farther apart and easier to see as the weeks 
have gone 
by. Now I'm thinking that maybe I could have used my usual pins on the 
half-stitch 
figures after all?  Well, I don't know.  The most dense parts really are very 
close.
   So that is my pin story.  So what is going on here?  How do pins fit into 
the grand
scheme of things?  I mean, what is the theory about which types to use and 
how does
it all tend to work out in practice?  I had problems with the short pins, but 
perhaps that
was only because I wasn't used to them and is not characteristic.
    Third comments.  Some time ago spiders spoke about putting a hatpin into 
the 
pillow and a 45 degree angle and having the threads of the thrown-back 
bobbins go 
under the  pin.  At the time, I was working with 26-50 pairs of bobbins and 
this 
completely failed to register with me.  A few weeks back this topic came up 
again, 
and, working with 80 pairs of bobbins, this time I was intensely interested.  
Yes, with 
80 pairs I do have the problem of the threads of the unused pairs rising up 
and possible looping over the tops of the pins.  I tried flipping my sping 
holders over 3 or 4 times 
before laying them down and this helped but I still had problems.  The 
situation is much 
better now that I try to make the threads go under a pin.  I'm using my usual 
pin since I 
don't have a hat pin and I still see great improvement.  Things will get even 
better once I 
buy a bigger pin, maybe a divider pin of something.
   Second, it seems to me that people have said that there is a limit to the 
number of 
bobbins you can handle with the stitch holder method.  Apparently, 80 pairs 
is nowhere
vlose to that limit.  I can envision my pillow easily handling another twenty 
pairs.  So I 
don't yet have to try any of the more advanced methods, which is good becuase 
I have
forgotten what they were (just like I totally forgot about the 45 degree 
pins.  It is good for
me that the subject came up again).
  Third, this project has a most amusing rhythym to it.  I like ground, but 
sometimes it 
seems a bit boring.  With this project, I have to focus so carefully on 
finding the tiny 
figure border pinholes and on making sure my incredibly wide and dense 
half-stitch 
rows  (up to 26 pairs wide so far!) don't become disarranged, then it is a 
pleasant
change of pace to go to the ground.  And the ground works up particularly 
quickly 
because it is only half as dense as the figure. So the rhythym is:  focus, 
focus, don't 
let the bobbins hop over each other, find the tiny pinhole, concentrate; ah, 
relax, stretch 
out, relax, relax, relax; focus, focus, concentrate, concentrate ;  relax, 
stretch, take it 

easy.  So it's sort of fun to have a project with two different pinhole 
densities.  Usually
ground is easier and faster than figures, but, because it is the same density 
as the 
figures, I don't get that relaxing stretching out feeling when I switch to it.
                                                                              
      Julie   Baltimore MD

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to