Hmmm. Not to start an international copyright war, or anything, but - suppose somebody did make that mat from the photo, without using the pricking that Ruth Bean published. Would they be able to, say, make a hi-resolution scan of the mat that they made, and then either sell it or provide it to lacemakers for free, and have it all be perfectly legal?
Just wondering. Adele West Vancouver, BC (west coast of Canada) On 2014-01-03, at 4:36 PM, Clay Blackwell wrote: > I also have the book you mention, but I can tell you that, from the > experience that I have had in reconstruction, blowing up (a grainy process) > from a grainy picture in an old book, will leave you very unhappy about what > you are seeing. In spite of that, I challenge you to do this and will be the > first to admit that you have achieved a miracle, if and when it is done!!! > >> On Jan 3, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Louise in Central Virginia >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have Ruth Bean's book on Ms Chandler and resolved that if I every decided >> to try the Mat, I would just scan the picture of it in the book, enlarge to >> size and work directly othe picture as a pricking. I think That would work >> for me and no problem with copywrites - To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line: unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to [email protected]. Photo site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/
