Dear Sue,
I would add to this.  I have two cloth stitch tapes on the side of my altar 
cloth pattern.  I actually measured the distance the worker pair went per pass, 
multiplied it by the number of passes per motif, so I had an idea of the amount 
needed for the worker pair.  I then multiplied that figure by 1.5 so I could go 
without adding a pair and allow for twists and inaccuracies.  This is not a 
foolproof method, and I suggest doubling the figure you get for the actual use 
to allow for the way lace eats up thread, but it is a start.  I keep notes on 
how much thread I wind on, and how much is left over so I know if my method 
works.  Usually I wind too much thread, but that is better than the alternative 
in my opinion.  I'm using linen, and that's relatively cheap.  If I were using 
an expensive thread, I might think differently.  Thread is the cheapest thing 
we use to make lace.    

When I know how much to put on a bobbin, and it's a number of yards, but could 
be meters, I wind the amount on a yardstick first, and put the right amount on 
the bobbin.  When I'm done, I measure how much is left, roughly on the bobbins 
if it's significant, so I can be more accurate the next time.  I don't do this 
for everything, certainly, but when I'm doing the same pattern over and over, 
this record keeping can help winding a more accurate amount of thread the next 
time around for the same patterns, and I'm making 3 strips of each size.  

Lyn from Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA


"My email sends out an automatic  message. Arachne members,
please ignore it. I read your emails."



Bev wrote:
>For a pattern for a garment, using a minimal number of bobbins, the broad
>answer is 'lots' of thread.
>
>One can get a good idea of the amounts per passive by placing a single
>thread all along the curving trail, then measuring that thread. I do this
>for the entire length if it is a small Russian tape pattern, could get away
>with measuring a quarter of the design if it is large, multiply by 4 for
>the length per passive bobbin.
>Allow more thread on the passive edge pairs for the extra twist, if using
>CTCT at the edges, and especially for the passive pair that will depart
>with the weaver to do any fillings, and though it seems a small amount
>allow for the tethers on all bobbins as well!
>Hope this helps.
>Bev in Shirley BC, near Sooke on beautiful Vancouver Island, west coast of
>Canada
>

-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]. Photo site:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/

Reply via email to