Thinking already ahead how XMPP messages should be formatted. Currently laconica XMPP messages carry also atom entries where georss might be included(?). Now is this the right place for XEP-080 User Location information?
Or is XEP-080 data carried outside the atom entry tag? After a short comparison the benefit of XEP-080 is better structured location information compared to georss. why it makes sense to have it. Wondering if it's widely used... Jaakko On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:07 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote: > >> What about XMPP? how are you planing to allow an user to update current > >> location via XMPP or just set current dent location? > > To set current location, we could add another command, like "location" > > or "loc". > > > > We could use the L: syntax, supported by e.g. twittermap, to set the > > location of an individual dent. > > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/microblogging-nanoformats > > In addition, XEP-0080 (User Location) > http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0080.html should be supported. > > ~Craig > _______________________________________________ > Laconica-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.laconi.ca/mailman/listinfo/laconica-dev > -- Jaakko
_______________________________________________ Laconica-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.laconi.ca/mailman/listinfo/laconica-dev
