Forgot one important point:

:''Eligibility of a language without a valid ISO 639-3 code, but with a
valid BCP 47 code.''
This would be a novelty.

2017-05-19 0:33 GMT+02:00 MF-Warburg <[email protected]>:

> I put my draft on <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_committee/
> Voting_policy>, comments on the talk page, and reproduce it below.
> It shouldn't have anything new in it that wasn't already mentioned before.
> Feel free to edit on Meta or write your opinions here.
>
> {{draft}}
>
> The Language Committee, with the approval of the Board, decided to change
> its rules for decision-making. So far, every decision required "consensus",
> defined as "no objections".
> * Decisions of the Language Committee will continue to be made on the
> mailing list and the committee will continue to try to achieve consensus
> for them. If there has been no objection to a proposed decision one week
> (two weeks for policy changes?) after the proposal was made, it is so
> decided.
> * When there is an objection to a proposed decision, any member may call
> for a vote. A vote must then be held, but it should only start after the
> question was discussed thoroughly.
> * A vote will last for one week (two weeks for policy changes?). A vote
> starts when a member sends a mail with the exact question to the list. The
> subject of all the mails must include [VOTE] so that every member can
> easily filter and notice such important mails.
> * The following majorities of participating members are needed for a
> decision to be adopted by vote:
> **Simple majority
> ***[[Language_proposal_policy#Requisites_for_eligibility|Eligibility]] of
> projects in languages that have a valid ISO 639-3 code
> ***Eligibility of a language without a valid ISO 639-3 code, but with a
> valid BCP 47 code.
> ***Final approval
> **2/3 majority
> ***Any change of the rules, including the committee's role in possible
> changes of the [[Language proposal policy]] and [[Closing projects policy]].
>
> Some special provisions:
> * The procedures according to the [[closing projects policy]] are
> unchanged.
> * Full consensus is still required for accepting new members. Like all
> personal issues, they will be discussed on the non-public mailing list.
> * Any committee member can mark clearly eligible [[requests for new
> languages]] as eligible. Requirements are: the language has a valid ISO
> 639-3 code, there are no significant issues with regard to the language
> itself, the population of speakers is significant.
> ** If a request turns out to be contentious, the commitee can remove the
> eligibility status again.
> * It is not possible to vote on approving a project which doesn't meet the
> [[Language_proposal_policy#Requisites_for_final_approval|requisites for
> final approval]].
>
> ==Comments==
> :''(two weeks for policy changes?)''
> Yay or nay?
>
> :''When there is an objection to a proposed decision, any member may call
> for a vote. A vote must then be held, but it should only start after the
> question was discussed thoroughly.''
> I added this to prevent a voting is started immediately after someone says
> something against an idea/proposal. Because of the current system,
> discussions pretty much stop at that point, but under the new system, it
> would be good if they went on first before everyone has to take a side.
>
> :''The subject of all the mails must include [VOTE] so that every member
> can easily filter and notice such important mails.''
> This was requested in Berlin.
>
>
> 2017-05-18 9:00 GMT+02:00 Oliver Stegen <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> that really makes me sad. We had really good rapport and momentum when we
>> met in Berlin, and I would've thought that we'd be able to transfer that to
>> our online communication. Is there still hope to mend what happened
>> yesterday? (Now my troubles no longer seem so far away ...)
>>
>> Yours for the under-represented language communities of our planet,
>> Oliver
>>
>> On 18-May-17 07:52, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>>
>> Hoi,
>> No as far as I am concerned the conversation has soured. I prefer for us
>> to take stock and not rush on.
>> Thanks,
>>       GerardM
>>
>> On 17 May 2017 at 23:08, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> We could do that. MF-Warburg could put the proposal on wiki, so we
>>> could discuss and comment there, as well. (But, we'll make the final
>>> decision and final changes, if necessary, here. So, Gerard, don't
>>> worry if you prefer to talk just on list.)
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Oliver Stegen <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Thanks to both of you, Milos and MF-Warburg, for providing the text.
>>> >
>>> > I was simply thinking that discussing a text with comments in an online
>>> > document would be much less cumbersome than doing so in an email list
>>> with
>>> > stacked responses. But whatever you prefer ...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 17-May-17 22:54, Milos Rancic wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:52 PM, MF-Warburg <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> By the way, I created a draft for a policy on "calling votes", which
>>> >>> includes these details. I can send it in a few hours.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thank you very much! :)
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Langcom mailing list
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ---
>>> >> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>>> >> http://www.avg.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Langcom mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Langcom mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>  Virus-free.
>> www.avg.com
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>> <#m_-4221379748092000586_m_3111046316371638656_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing 
>> [email protected]https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to