Hoi,
Yes you do.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 13 June 2017 at 04:42, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote:
> The proposal exactly is that the eligibility of such languages should be
> decided by a (simple majority) vote. Or do I misunderstand the objection?
>
> 2017-05-19 3:32 GMT+02:00 Michael Everson <[email protected]>:
>
>> I agree with Gerard. A primary code in BPC 47 would be a rarity, and not
>> something to be adopted here without a proper vote.
>>
>> Michael Everson
>>
>> On 19 May 2017, at 01:24, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I do not support the Notion of a simple majority When there is no
>> ISO639 3. I want arguments and eventualy a vote.
>> > Thanks,
>> > GerardM
>> >
>> > Op vr 19 mei 2017 om 01:08 schreef MF-Warburg <[email protected]
>> >
>> > Forgot one important point:
>> >
>> > :''Eligibility of a language without a valid ISO 639-3 code, but with a
>> valid BCP 47 code.''
>> > This would be a novelty.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
