The proposal exactly is that the eligibility of such languages should be decided by a (simple majority) vote. Or do I misunderstand the objection?
2017-05-19 3:32 GMT+02:00 Michael Everson <[email protected]>: > I agree with Gerard. A primary code in BPC 47 would be a rarity, and not > something to be adopted here without a proper vote. > > Michael Everson > > On 19 May 2017, at 01:24, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I do not support the Notion of a simple majority When there is no ISO639 > 3. I want arguments and eventualy a vote. > > Thanks, > > GerardM > > > > Op vr 19 mei 2017 om 01:08 schreef MF-Warburg <[email protected]> > > Forgot one important point: > > > > :''Eligibility of a language without a valid ISO 639-3 code, but with a > valid BCP 47 code.'' > > This would be a novelty. > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
