Hoi,
We had Klingon at one time.. Do you really consider revisiting that ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 8 December 2017 at 23:22, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, MF-Warburg <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Can we, by the way, define more detailed criteria for which artificial
> > languages should be eligible?
>
> Agreed. If we count native speakers, Klingon is, AFAIK, immediately
> after Esperanto.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
