Hoi,
In an alternate universe maybe.
Thanks,
GerardM
Op za 9 dec. 2017 om 13:24 schreef Milos Rancic <[email protected]>
> I've just said that Klingon makes more sense than LFN, as it actually has
> native speakers.
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2017 06:55, "Gerard Meijssen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hoi,
>> We had Klingon at one time.. Do you really consider revisiting that ?
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>> On 8 December 2017 at 23:22, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, MF-Warburg <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Can we, by the way, define more detailed criteria for which artificial
>>> > languages should be eligible?
>>>
>>> Agreed. If we count native speakers, Klingon is, AFAIK, immediately
>>> after Esperanto.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Langcom mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
