I've just said that Klingon makes more sense than LFN, as it actually has native speakers.
On Dec 9, 2017 06:55, "Gerard Meijssen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hoi, > We had Klingon at one time.. Do you really consider revisiting that ? > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 8 December 2017 at 23:22, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Can we, by the way, define more detailed criteria for which artificial >> > languages should be eligible? >> >> Agreed. If we count native speakers, Klingon is, AFAIK, immediately >> after Esperanto. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
