Hoi,
We ask for an ISO 639-3. This does not change anything.
Thanks,
GerardM
Op di 26 dec. 2017 om 23:43 schreef Steven White <[email protected]>
> I was going to hold off on this until the holidays are over, but rather
> remarkably, unless somebody hacked the Library of Congress's web site
> <https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_changes.php>,
> Montenegrin has been granted an ISO 639–2 code ("cnr"). This has been in
> the air over the last month, and represents the first addition to ISO 639–2
> in over five years. The Montenegrin community is jumping for joy, and I've
> just full-protected the page Requests for new languages/Wikipedia
> Montenegrin 5
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Montenegrin_5>
> on Meta because the discussion is getting out of hand.
>
>
> If srwiki, hrwiki and bswiki didn't exist, we wouldn't have to create this
> one, either. But I have to admit that I don't really see any way we can
> currently justify not approving this project (as "eligible"). My questions
> are, therefore:
>
>
> - Am I right about that?
> - Is LangCom willing to see this project marked as "eligible" based on
> an ISO 639-2 code alone?
> - The rules are that non-collective ISO 639-2 codes are supposed to be
> reflected in ISO 639-3 as well. So do I wait until this code is published
> by SIL?
> - If so, what happens if SIL does not take action?
>
>
> Steven
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
