It’s true. This language is as far as anyone knows identical to Serbian according to the classification we currently use. It is not certain that there could be a Monenegrin Wiki that would differ in any meaningful way from the Serbian one.
> On 26 Dec 2017, at 22:43, Steven White <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was going to hold off on this until the holidays are over, but rather > remarkably, unless somebody hacked the Library of Congress's web site, > Montenegrin has been granted an ISO 639–2 code ("cnr"). This has been in the > air over the last month, and represents the first addition to ISO 639–2 in > over five years. The Montenegrin community is jumping for joy, and I've just > full-protected the page Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Montenegrin 5 on > Meta because the discussion is getting out of hand. > > If srwiki, hrwiki and bswiki didn't exist, we wouldn't have to create this > one, either. But I have to admit that I don't really see any way we can > currently justify not approving this project (as "eligible"). My questions > are, therefore: > • Am I right about that? > • Is LangCom willing to see this project marked as "eligible" based on > an ISO 639-2 code alone? > • The rules are that non-collective ISO 639-2 codes are supposed to be > reflected in ISO 639-3 as well. So do I wait until this code is published by > SIL? > • If so, what happens if SIL does not take action? > > Steven > > Sent from Outlook > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
