2013/9/22 Daniel Naber <[email protected]>
> On 2013-09-22 11:51, Jaume Ortolà i Font wrote:
>
> > default parameters. So yes, I would prefer another way to deal with
> > it. Perhaps what you suggested at first: ValencianCatalan implements
> > getEnabledRules and getDisabledRules, and then in
> > JLanguageTool.loadPatternRules these values are applied. Would this be
> > okay?
>
> Sounds okay to me (but this should wait until after the release).
>
>
I was going to implement these changes (define default enabled & disabled
pattern rules for different language variants). But now Stefan Lotties
plans to modify the way of loading pattern rules [1]. So do I go ahead or
wait?
Regards,
Jaume Ortolà
[1] https://github.com/languagetool-org/languagetool/issues/14
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
