On 2013-10-17 17:26, Andriy Rysin wrote:

> Yes, I would like it to work for all targets: standalone/addons etc so
> inclusion should work in jars as well. I'll keep looking.

What if we extend the Language class to return a list of filenames that 
are used to read the rules, instead of having only "grammar.xml" hard 
coded? This way we could also have an optional file "user-grammar.xml" 
which is loaded if it exists and which could carry user-specific rules.

Regards
  Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel

Reply via email to