On 2013-10-18 12:10, Mike Unwalla wrote: > Thus, with a method that only links to a user-grammar.xml file and > which > does not give me a way to ignore the default disambiguation rules, I > cannot > use the STE term checker in OpenOffice/LibreOffice.
But with your approach, you have to provide your own modified download anyway, don't you? > Is it possible to have a design/structure for OO/LO such that the > default LT > grammar file and the default disambiguation file are optional? This way a user could use your STE term checker and still switch to the standard English rules, while currently he can have your STE checker installed, *or* the standard LT, is that correct? The STE term checker should already work in LO/OO if you modify the grammar.xml to contain only your rules. Having such an interface is technically possible, but it would be hidden deep in some menu. If the user makes a configuration change and forgets about it, they might think LT doesn't work. As far as I know, we have hardly any way to interact with the user when in OO/LO, everything happens through the LO/OO dialogs (unless the user explicitly opens LT from the menu). Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
