On 2013-10-17 17:50, Daniel Naber wrote: > What if we extend the Language class to return a list of filenames that > are used to read the rules, instead of having only "grammar.xml" hard > coded? This way we could also have an optional file "user-grammar.xml" > which is loaded if it exists and which could carry user-specific rules.
A test reveals this is quite dangerous: if you have the user-grammar.xml in the settings directory of LibreOffice, LO will simply remove your file without warning if you uninstall LT. I assume the same might happen on LT updates. So the safer way seems to be to use XML includes, as discussed elsewhere in this thread. Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
