On 2010-08-10, at 16:32, Raju Bitter wrote: > As an Adobe expert said: OL DHTML is the closest you can get to Flash > without using Flash, but many people don't know that fact. To me, > DHTML sounds old, ugly and out-dated.
Can we get that "on the record"? My only fear with switching to HTML5 is that that will be stale in a few years too. We want a term that means just what your Adobe guy said: Flash without Flash. What do the other popular frameworks like JQuery call themselves? Are they still saying AJAX? Can we invent a new term that conveys what is special about OL, and own that term, so it can't go stale?
