Is OpenWeb defined somewhere? This (http://openwebfoundation.org/) doesn't seem to be what you are talking about.
We advertise "dhtml" as running on any browser that supports "ECMAScript v3, DOM Level 2, and CSS 2.1" (http://www.openlaszlo.org/requirements/) Is there a term for that? On 2010-08-10, at 17:13, Raju Bitter wrote: > I think it's about coming up with an answer to that question. I'm just > trying to motivate some of the people on this mailing lists to come up > with good answers. > > You could call it "JavaScript Runtime". "Web Runtime" is used by Nokia > and Azingo to describe their mobile frameworks (webkit+js+css+html5) > for creating mobile apps. > > But OpenWeb runtime pretty much describes what you are aiming for, a > runtime based on the standard which are created as part of the open > web. Actually better than HTML5, but of course it's not as technical > as Ajax or DHTML. > > In 12-18 months many people will be building mobile app with OL, and > terms like RIA and Ajax are less relevant, especially with the mobile > app success. Some of the open web folks have been saying that FF and > Webkit are essentially the runtimes of the open web. > > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:44 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2010-08-10, at 16:32, Raju Bitter wrote: >> >>> As an Adobe expert said: OL DHTML is the closest you can get to Flash >>> without using Flash, but many people don't know that fact. To me, >>> DHTML sounds old, ugly and out-dated. >> >> Can we get that "on the record"? >> >> My only fear with switching to HTML5 is that that will be stale in a few >> years too. >> >> We want a term that means just what your Adobe guy said: Flash without >> Flash. What do the other popular frameworks like JQuery call themselves? >> Are they still saying AJAX? Can we invent a new term that conveys what is >> special about OL, and own that term, so it can't go stale?
