Anything we pick will be stale in a few years... I vote for HTML5 :) On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:44 PM, P T Withington wrote:
> On 2010-08-10, at 16:32, Raju Bitter wrote: > >> As an Adobe expert said: OL DHTML is the closest you can get to Flash >> without using Flash, but many people don't know that fact. To me, >> DHTML sounds old, ugly and out-dated. > > Can we get that "on the record"? > > My only fear with switching to HTML5 is that that will be stale in a few > years too. > > We want a term that means just what your Adobe guy said: Flash without > Flash. What do the other popular frameworks like JQuery call themselves? > Are they still saying AJAX? Can we invent a new term that conveys what is > special about OL, and own that term, so it can't go stale?
